Public alliances

[xvi]

I do not think there should be private alliances anymore. If there is not going to be competition for #1, make everyone public next round and give everyone a chance to try and take you dooooooown.

ps: piss on occupy wallstreet. poor people are always whining.

 

[Podunk]

Oh my, that'd be fun if the drunks started a trend

 

[Iamsmart]

nope, would reveal every solo=bad idea.

 

[Zaheen]

nope, would reveal every solo=bad idea.

You iz smart!

Private Limit: 10
Public Limit: 15

:Fade-color

 

[willymchilybily]

wow this is like a time warp, people suggesting public alliances and others suggesting small alliance sizes. Déjà vu

 

[Ogluk]

How about real bonuses for public allies, a la the old Psolo bonuses higher insurance/shorter tech times/cheaper techs etc

 

[LuckySports]

maybe higher insurance, but i can't agree with the rest..

And Zaheen - just.. no.. We've gone over smaller alliance sizes hundreds of times. It always comes down to the same thing - it hurts the game. A LOT

 

[Elderveld]

30 priv alliance? 35 public ? if public classed(after 2day's) they get + x % insurance - x % dev mod.

 

[edd]

I don't like the idea of increasing alliance size as there aren't enough targets as it is

 

[LuckySports]

pfft, there are tons of targets! I've been grabbing land constantly..

 

[Dimitar]

60 man alliances please

 

[xvi]

nope, would reveal every solo=bad idea.

bah, you can tell whose solo by day 4

 

[xvi]

wow this is like a time warp, people suggesting public alliances and others suggesting small alliance sizes. Déjà vu

haha. then someone should start listening....

 

[LuckySports]

They keep getting shot down for a reason.. People will go public if they want to.

 

[Zaheen]

60 man alliances please

How about no alliance limit? Join the best or die.

Remove AR from solos as well, the game should not be able to kill you.

 

[timtadams]

200% insurance


**** you, i aint trolling

do it

 

[Twigley]

Oh my, that'd be fun if the drunks started a trend

Implying DIP are the only alliance to go public from the start recently ;P

 

[Ogluk]

Oh my, that'd be fun if the drunks started a trend

Implying DIP are the only alliance to go public from the start recently ;P

that were actually playing to any level that can really be considered playing, yes

 

[willymchilybily]

wow this is like a time warp, people suggesting public alliances and others suggesting small alliance sizes. Déjà vu

haha. then someone should start listening....

or maybe you should start using the search function ,
Public alliance discussion previously

Even azzer wanted public alliances.

As for Zaheen, well theres no hope for him hes created several of the "change alliance size" threads that have been argued to death and normally not in favour. particularly as alliance sizes have been played with in the past and its about at its optimum atm.

Ps know it wasnt recent. but looking over some old posts. i think Hell were public, and some one else from the start.. and didnt hell win? or maybe i just got my wires crossed, i think i was solo that round so barely remeber

 

[xvi]

wow this is like a time warp, people suggesting public alliances and others suggesting small alliance sizes. Déjà vu

haha. then someone should start listening....

or maybe you should start using the search function ,
Public alliance discussion previously

Even azzer wanted public alliances.

As for Zaheen, well theres no hope for him hes created several of the "change alliance size" threads that have been argued to death and normally not in favour. particularly as alliance sizes have been played with in the past and its about at its optimum atm.

Ps know it wasnt recent. but looking over some old posts. i think Hell were public, and some one else from the start.. and didnt hell win? or maybe i just got my wires crossed, i think i was solo that round so barely remeber

Problem is those old posts are....old. And no one looks at them except to tell someone else they were there. Also, just because something has been suggested before doesn't mean it cannot be suggested again at a new time and under new circumstances. The vote on that post was as big as today's active playerbase. So, circumstances were obviously different then.

To be the devil's advocate on Zaheen's post, alliance sizes being optimum now is matter of opinion, not fact. You should consider the fact that not all your thoughts are as is, or the most true despite your knowledge of the game.