Right, I think I should just post something to explain the situation here a little. RRR is a good alliance, sort of like WH, and no one is doubting it. I do, however, agree with goku. Although there is definitely skill amongst the RRR players, the difference is not significant. As long as you have an alliance that is extremely active and extremely contactable. You can do
relatively well.
To be honest, the flames on here are kind of getting ridiculous. I don't mean to point our names but Ahead, Silence and Alci.
All three of you know I have tremendous respect for you guys, and I still do to a certain extent. But the unnecessary flammings are really getting on my nerves. What the hell is the point of proving that you are better by arguing over the forums? I don’t understand why you guys feel the need to say words such as “noob” or “stfu” etc. You can illustrate a point quite well without using those words.
I realize that by posting this I am going to get flamed (what a surprise), but honestly, I really don’t care anymore. I just want to point out that, apart from being on different sides every round, RRR and TBA aren’t that different themselves.
Let me illustrate this using examples:
Last round, FeR was rank 1 by miles, and he suicide on SAS. Everyone laughed at him, including our own alliance
. This round, Polo suicide on SAS early on as well. And if I remember correctly, he was one of the biggest players in the game. The only difference was that at this point RRR did not have the victory yet. So wouldn’t you say Polo’s suicide had a bigger impact?
Again, last round TBA were flamed literally nonstop for their infamous suicides. This round, the tables have turned. RRR are now on top with other allies playing defensive. I’m sure all the smaller allies have the BRs to prove it. Emnity alone have several BRs where we’ve killed roughly 3 tril and lost nothing. Sure, the typical excuses can be used, but again, this just reiterates my point that there is little difference between the two groups: Both allies die on attacks. In fact, RRR’s suicides are worse because they don’t even have the round locked up. Of course, no one dares to call RRR noobs because simply, they have big names. But ask yourselves, deep down, are our tactics really that different? Or is it that TBA were just made fun of because they were full of noobs instead of big names.
Another example is bashing. Yes we have bashed with three alliances. But round after round, alliances have bashed several on a tick. In fact, this morning, one of my members had 6 incomings spread over two ticks. Sure, you can argue that TBA bashed with three alliances, but fundamentally, both allies bashed.
Of course, in all three examples, you can argue that TBA was a 3-ally powerblock. Yes, that is true, but what you made fun of us for was not because of our powerblocking, but rather our “skill,” (or lack of skill ). And yet, it is pretty evident from this round that both groups employed roughly the same tactics.
The point I am trying to get across is that players should stop flaming each other and show more love on the forums. There is absolutely no point in flaming each other, other than for “LULZ”. I’m fairly certain no one in Emnity, Fail or S2N have boasted about us killing RRR on defense (unless you can prove me wrong of course), so why was it acceptable that WH did so last round?
Just my two cents anyways.
Edit: Just for marvin, "bullshit"