Responses to recruitment threads are very much welcome and you can choose to either endorse a player's request for membership or, alternatively, leave a negative review of their play style.
Both types of response are bound by the same rules as any other sub-forum.
Criticism of another player is not breaking any rules, although in an ideal world this criticism should be constructive.
The only rule you should bear in mind when considering a negative response to a recruitment thread is:
By all means leave a bad review of someone's playstyle (or lack thereof) but don't be cruel/attack the character of that person.
Examples of both:
"I've played on X number of occasions with Bloggsy. He is not a very active player, he does not work well as part of a team, his communication is lacking/none-existent and he's rarely online"
"I played with Bloggsy last round. He's basically a bit of a retard, avoid him at all costs because he sucks".
Basically, its not difficult to say something negative whilst still being nice/reasonable about.
Both types of response are bound by the same rules as any other sub-forum.
Criticism of another player is not breaking any rules, although in an ideal world this criticism should be constructive.
The only rule you should bear in mind when considering a negative response to a recruitment thread is:
- Challenge other's points of view and opinions, but do so respectfully and courteously. Be civil and constructive, not ignorant and rude.
By all means leave a bad review of someone's playstyle (or lack thereof) but don't be cruel/attack the character of that person.
Examples of both:
"I've played on X number of occasions with Bloggsy. He is not a very active player, he does not work well as part of a team, his communication is lacking/none-existent and he's rarely online"
"I played with Bloggsy last round. He's basically a bit of a retard, avoid him at all costs because he sucks".
Basically, its not difficult to say something negative whilst still being nice/reasonable about.