BRING BACK THE ORIGINAL NUTTAH.
That is all.
They totally should have been targetting either straight all. Or nlt. Not lethal all.
But i agree £3,000 nutters firing all ticks was it? Much more fun. Had its uses against units targetting all thats for sure.
They totally should have been targetting either straight all. Or nlt. Not lethal all.
But i agree £3,000 nutters firing all ticks was it? Much more fun. Had its uses against units targetting all thats for sure.
Almost - it was £3k and targetted R/M. But I say make it target close as well and perhaps bump the price up to £6k, it would be a tremendous unit!!!
LET/INN
strip geos for yobs.
LET/INN
strip geos for yobs.
Would be more useful for the cg id expect. Stripping after guru poms. And before yobs and sd.
But would rather have it as a unit to help you land imo. Terror Tl dogs isnt often last ticked unless by armour route or lot of flak assisting. But easy to block. Poms will soak up dogs and flak.but they could assist you landing if they just targetted all/nlt to disrup the sweepers though id settle for a compromise of nlt/inn not like they re ever gonna be enough of them in your army to be put to good effect last ticking lethals at that initiative
Then again they should have just made surfs an nld with a bit more ad. (so still vunerable to less used routes/ units eg auto/vd that are around at flak wars) and do what you say above with the nutters.
Tbh, at that initiative they fire before CW and TD and apaches so that does help with being last ticked by armour which happens all the time (not sure what u r talking about ).
Dogs go about 50:1 on CW so they are hopeless on LT. An AD buff on nutters would go a long way to making it a viable unit
I would most deffo take on TL/dogs as an SA last tick :s
I would most deffo take on TL/dogs as an SA last tick :s