What's going on so far?

[Dax]

Originally Posted by Twigley

No no no again you are foolish and just completely miss the point like you did on IRC yesterday where i had to explain everything to you before you finally got the point.

I'm saying your reponse to my post was just not needed.
My post was basically highlighting the fact that you shouldnt be moaning about how such an awesome unit such as CG has SOME slight hinderance against WK.

It's a fair point and saying it isnt relevant is just stupid.

But now that i've explained everything for you again, i hope you can see you just mis understood what was being said.

Alot of people don't use CG, so my saying they even rape something that Apaches only get 1:0.9 on, or 1:0.997 for PoMs is meant to highlight how strong they are.
And like I said, it wasn't a complaint; There should be a unit that can handle CG early into the round, and WK are that counter IMO - You just have to play fair to get that ability, s'all.

[Changer]

Shocks and PB

[WackyJacky]

I think shocks are an underrated unit.

[Elle]

Originally Posted by Caranthir

I <3 Twigs

I thought you loved me.....I'm hurt! </3

[Dax]

WK were out before either unit, as I remember? We all know there ARE units that beat CG, it's more a case of there being one at around the time people can actually have them in threatening numbers. It's a cheap tech, a fast tech, and it can make all the difference to where you turn out in two weeks if you are on the ball. The nature of the beast though, I guess. I don't think there's TOO much of an issue with WK as they are, maybe lower the attack stat a little.

[Caranthir]

Originally Posted by Elle

I thought you loved me.....I'm hurt! </3

It is a different kind of love for Twigley. The kind that comes from trolling him with things that don't make any sense, and the more sense he tries to make of it, the less sense it makes.

You I just love.

[Cheese]

Originally Posted by Dax

Alot of people don't use CG, so my saying they even rape something that Apaches only get 1:0.9 on, or 1:0.997 for PoMs is meant to highlight how strong they are.
And like I said, it wasn't a complaint; There should be a unit that can handle CG early into the round, and WK are that counter IMO - You just have to play fair to get that ability, s'all.

Well maybe you should word things better next time and not act so slow?
And you say so many things are off topic... this is in the alliance forum regarding politics titled 'What's going on so far?' now if you can explain how talking about cg's is in anyway shape or form on topic of my thread please do.

To break things down for you so you actually understand please reply to my post like this:
1) You need to have worded your original post better
2) Why are you so slow? (this is a question simple answer will be sufficient)
3) How was your post about cg ontopic?
4) What gives you the right to tell someone to stay on topic are you a moderator? - I am only saying it to you to show you how moronic it is and how much of an idiot it makes you look, I don't do this to other people so yes you may consider yourself 'special' but I probably think you are special in a completely different way to you do.

[Dax]

Originally Posted by Cheese

Well maybe you should word things better next time and not act so slow?
And you say so many things are off topic... this is in the alliance forum regarding politics titled 'What's going on so far?' now if you can explain how talking about cg's is in anyway shape or form on topic of my thread please do.

To break things down for you so you actually understand please reply to my post like this:
1) You need to have worded your original post better
2) Why are you so slow? (this is a question simple answer will be sufficient)
3) How was your post about cg ontopic?
4) What gives you the right to tell someone to stay on topic are you a moderator? - I am only saying it to you to show you how moronic it is and how much of an idiot it makes you look, I don't do this to other people so yes you may consider yourself 'special' but I probably think you are special in a completely different way to you do.

You aren't reading again. Classic fail on your part; It was about White Knights and their effect on people's attacking since H/F being reintroduced, which you may find totally relevant to the subject of what's been happening this round.
Who am I to tell you to stay on topic? Well, if somebody can't ask for something to be kept logical and on-topic that is of authority, why am I wrong to point it out? It's the idea of a forum discussion; to discuss, not to act like a child. I'd happily reinforce such a point to your face, but alas, the downside of the internet is people can elude common sense on what a real discussion is from behind a monitor, it appears.
But saying that, Asmo has warned all to stay on-topic, and cut flaming in another one of the threads you and your cronies have spammed to the high heavens. You can PM me if you have an issue with me, cause I think people are just getting bored of watching me make you look like a tool.

[Cheese]

Originally Posted by Cheese

Well as somebody who isn't involved with any alliance play this round I'm quite interested to see what's going on?

I see one ally pulling ahead a bit so come on people bring on the updates!

As you can see the thread was made to discuss alliance goings on etc. Not units in the game.

But White knights? Most certainly. Or do you have to be special to interpret that?
Dax... as I requested answer the questions / reply to the points it's as simple as 1,2,3,4.


p.s. I'm pointing out how stupid / moronic you are for crying like a little girl when somebody disagrees with you by going "stay on topic!"
You aint a moderator and you clearly never will be one so please leave the rule enforcement to the bigger kids at least they have more intelligence than you.

But don't worry this is my last post responding to your stupidity, unless you actually learn to read and address the points I have brought to your very small attention.

[Twigley]

Dax i think you'll find it's people making you look the tool and don't agree with what YOU are saying. Read all the threads where you post, it's a common theme.

Jus saying.

[Caranthir]

Originally Posted by Cheese

As you can see the thread was made to discuss alliance goings on etc. Not units in the game.

But White knights? Most certainly. Or do you have to be special to interpret that?
Dax... as I requested answer the questions / reply to the points it's as simple as 1,2,3,4.


p.s. I'm pointing out how stupid / moronic you are for crying like a little girl when somebody disagrees with you by going "stay on topic!"
You aint a moderator and you clearly never will be one so please leave the rule enforcement to the bigger kids at least they have more intelligence than you.

But don't worry this is my last post responding to your stupidity, unless you actually learn to read and address the points I have brought to your very small attention.

The subject line reads "What's going on so far".

Not "how is the alliance play so far", or "how big is Twigs ego today".

Just because you interpreted the subject as one thing does not mean that any events related to specific occurrences in the round. I would say just about anything suffices in game.

[Cheese]

Originally Posted by Caranthir

The subject line reads "What's going on so far".

Not "how is the alliance play so far", or "how big is Twigs ego today".

Just because you interpreted the subject as one thing does not mean that any events related to specific occurrences in the round. I would say just about anything suffices in game.

Caranthir I made the thread, I know exactly how to interpret this thread thank you.

[webvictim]

Originally Posted by Cheese

Caranthir I made the thread, I know exactly how to interpret this thread thank you.

What this actually is means is that the second somebody you don't like posts something, you can say "uh, that wasn't what I meant", while conveniently ignoring the transgressions of anyone you actually do like.

Nepotism is not a good look.

[Ahead]

Originally Posted by webvictim

What this actually is means is that the second somebody you don't like posts something, you can say "uh, that wasn't what I meant", while conveniently ignoring the transgressions of anyone you actually do like.

Nepotism is not a good look.

I don't think Cheese doesn't like "them", I think Cheese's post was an ironic one highlighting the hypocrisy of some people telling others off for posting off-topic to the original topic but on-topic in terms to a post within the topic, when they themselves do it several times but overlook it. Particularly when the power distribution of ordinary members on the forum is equal therefore telling someone they cannot post something which is officially not breaking any rules when there are forum moderators to police this sort of behaviour (and they have not done anything to prevent it at that point) is just self-righteous and exhibiting a ridiculous level of unnecessarily and undeservedly "taking the moral highground".

Hope this clears it up for you.

P.S. You should be lucky that "somebody" doesn't tell you off for your post seeing as it has nothing to do with the original topic.

P.P.S. In response to the original topic so that I don't get told off: to me it looks like AR Mod has pulled away from all the other alliances! And I'm not sure if the alliances rank 2-6 have enough closeness, activity, or value to be able to resist. That's "what's going on so far" from my perspective :O

[Dax]

Originally Posted by Ahead

I don't think Cheese doesn't like "them", I think Cheese's post was an ironic one highlighting the hypocrisy of some people telling others off for posting off-topic to the original topic but on-topic in terms to a post within the topic, when they themselves do it several times but overlook it. Particularly when the power distribution of ordinary members on the forum is equal therefore telling someone they cannot post something which is officially not breaking any rules when there are forum moderators to police this sort of behaviour (and they have not done anything to prevent it at that point) is just self-righteous and exhibiting a ridiculous level of unnecessarily and undeservedly "taking the moral highground".

Hope this clears it up for you.

P.S. You should be lucky that "somebody" doesn't tell you off for your post seeing as it has nothing to do with the original topic.

P.P.S. In response to the original topic so that I don't get told off: to me it looks like AR Mod has pulled away from all the other alliances! And I'm not sure if the alliances rank 2-6 have enough closeness, activity, or value to be able to resist. That's "what's going on so far" from my perspective :O

It's common sense, not moral high ground.
I didn't reply because you and Cheese are making a commendable effort of making asses of yourselves, nobody need intervene any longer to prod you into doing it.