PDA

View Full Version : Remove p-naps for pure solos


f0xx
24-03-2008, 11:37 AM
The topic says it all, there should be advantages and disadvantages to normal solos and pure-solos.

At the moment you are either pure-solo or allied. There is no normal solo...

You want an extreme AR protection - then go pure solo.
You want softer AR protection and p-nap protection - then go normal solo.

At the moment it is just too much. The extreme AR protection and wisely chosen p-naps can easily make three active and expirienced players take the top three spots, gov. valuation wise and that is IMBA EZZMODE!

DarkSider
24-03-2008, 01:58 PM
I made some similar suggestions in the past. However i'm a firm beliver psolo is not overpowered in any way even with 2 pnaps. Sure if all 3 are highly active and experienced it can be a really tough job to land on any of them with reduced looses but i very much doubt in general the average player will choose to attack an allianced member if he spots a solo guy of same strenght.
I liked more my 'standalone' suggestion where either you can't have pnaps or for each pnap free you get a bit of extra bonus. Maybe for this type have AR calculating as land ^2 * 5 instead 8 for normal psolo so other routes other than ezzmode bunkers can be played even if all of them have a very weak spot to a certain attacker/combo :P

atsanjose
24-03-2008, 06:54 PM
wtf you want to get rid of me! :bad-words: :puppydogeyes:

CLem
24-03-2008, 08:25 PM
I liked more my 'standalone' suggestion where either you can't have pnaps or for each pnap free you get a bit of extra bonus. Maybe for this type have AR calculating as land ^2 * 5 instead 8 for normal psolo so other routes other than ezzmode bunkers can be played even if all of them have a very weak spot to a certain attacker/combo :P

Haha that will just make more lazy players to go ezzmode imba!!

Bobbin
24-03-2008, 11:15 PM
Agreed.

Having pnaps defeats the whole point of being solo imo.

dafe
25-03-2008, 12:22 AM
Agreed.

Having pnaps defeats the whole point of being solo imo.
unless your forced to be solo as you aint contactable enough to be in an ally, but i agree psolo could have some tweeks to make it more 'pure' solo

f0xx
25-03-2008, 07:50 AM
wtf you want to get rid of me! :bad-words: :puppydogeyes:

I try really hard sometimes, I even doubt its possible :P

wrath
27-03-2008, 12:44 PM
to be honest i found pnaps useless as pure solo

they seemed to just be a burden or they end up allied to other alliances and through that they become burdens

normally i do fine as pure solo on my own there are loads of advantages to make use of without using a pnap though it usually starts off very difficultly at the beginning