PDA

View Full Version : Whats Happening? | R30


Cyrus
19-02-2009, 04:02 PM
i see a certain alliance bursting ahead in score and land ;)

what are your thoughts on what could possibly happen...?

Alicus
19-02-2009, 04:16 PM
Which one is that? >_>

atsanjose
19-02-2009, 04:18 PM
the one on the top of the alliance page?

just a guess

n0c0ntr0l
19-02-2009, 05:25 PM
Oh we are just happily pulling away... whats the problem with that? isn't the point of this game to get land?

f0xx
19-02-2009, 05:31 PM
what are your thoughts on what could possibly happen...?

JJ realises he doesn't have enough harvesters.
JJ dies to a resistance.
JJ gives up.
f0xx dances around JJ's corpse.
f0xx spreads JJ's buttcheeks.
.
Oh wait you don't need to know that.

n0c0ntr0l
19-02-2009, 05:37 PM
JJ realises he doesn't have enough harvesters.
JJ dies to a resistance.
JJ gives up.
f0xx dances around JJ's corpse.
f0xx spreads JJ's buttcheeks.
.
Oh wait you don't need to know that.

you and jj's harvesters...

Nitrous
19-02-2009, 10:44 PM
JJ realises he doesn't have enough harvesters.
JJ dies to a resistance.
JJ gives up.
f0xx dances around JJ's corpse.
f0xx spreads JJ's buttcheeks.
.
Oh wait you don't need to know that.

rofl pwnd!

FeR
22-02-2009, 04:08 AM
JJ realises he doesn't have enough harvesters.
JJ dies to a resistance.
JJ gives up.
f0xx dances around JJ's corpse.
f0xx spreads JJ's buttcheeks.
.
Oh wait you don't need to know that.

f0xx quits ^^

brett
22-02-2009, 04:10 AM
f0xx quits ^^

HAHA love it fer

f0xx
22-02-2009, 08:55 AM
It will take you more than 60 people to make me quit FeR :)

Ogluk
22-02-2009, 10:57 AM
dont say that f0xx
they'll go and create another ally to spread their terror upon the world :<

pinpower
22-02-2009, 12:28 PM
http://www.bushtarion.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1921

Seems relevant! ;-)

f0xx
22-02-2009, 05:16 PM
JJ realises he doesn't have enough harvesters.
JJ dies to a resistance.
JJ gives up.
f0xx dances around JJ's corpse.
f0xx spreads JJ's buttcheeks.
.
Oh wait you don't need to know that.

Step one has already happened.

Next is step two.

Cyrus
22-02-2009, 10:10 PM
i suggest everyone rank 4 and below naps and rushes them every minute of everyday

yeah we all have no targets but if we all get together we could take their land and they cant retal us all.

Dark_Angel
22-02-2009, 10:47 PM
How's that resistance going f0xx?

[20:00] <x> You stole 800 land. [177] tree. [428] bush. [98] flower. [97] grass. [0] uncultivated.
[20:00] <x> You stole 783 land. [183] tree. [374] bush. [113] flower. [113] grass. [0] uncultivated.
[20:01] <x> You stole 784 land. [120] tree. [526] bush. [70] flower. [68] grass. [0] uncultivated.
[20:01] <x> You stole 588 land. [82] tree. [441] bush. [33] flower. [32] grass. [0] uncultivated.
[20:03] <x> [close] 60,807 hostile Geo-Phys Thief stole 969 land. [148] tree. [648] bush. [88] flower. [85] grass. [0] uncultivated.
[20:10] <x> You stole 825 land. [109] tree. [568] bush. [76] flower. [72] grass. [0] uncultivated.
[20:10] <x> [close] 482,424 allied Geo-Phys Thief stole 623 land. [107] tree. [441] bush. [38] flower. [37] grass. [0] uncultivated.
[20:19] <x>You stole 468 land. [91] tree. [196] bush. [87] flower. [94] grass. [0] uncultivated.
[22:40] <x> You stole 656 land. [112] tree. [455] bush. [47] flower. [42] grass. [0] uncultivated.
[22:40] <x> You stole 383 land. [85] tree. [205] bush. [47] flower. [46] grass. [0] uncultivated
[22:40] <x> You stole 518 land. [107] tree. [274] bush. [72] flower. [65] grass. [0] uncultivated.
[22:40] <x> You stole 315 land. [58] tree. [207] bush. [26] flower. [24] grass. [0] uncultivated.

[22:40] <DA|aweh> Hah. These guys didnt stand a chance.
[22:40] <DA|aweh> :o
[22:40] <x> lmao
[22:41] <DA|aweh> No pun intended

f0xx
22-02-2009, 10:50 PM
OH, you pwn me with your skillz DA.

Alcibiades
22-02-2009, 10:52 PM
lol DA, the day you land an attack on us alone you can earn some bragging rights ;)

f0xx
22-02-2009, 10:54 PM
lol DA, the day you land an attack on us alone you can earn some bragging rights ;)

Not going to mention that even that we lost 50k land, we still did MUCH more damage to them, even though they were better teched than us and were outnumbering us 3:1.

Alchemist
22-02-2009, 11:03 PM
"and they cant retal us all. "

yes you can, you get a +2 but sure you can retal, so you send your allaiance at the top, they get online, retal steal ur land adn block ur attack.

..go for it

JJbrosandjl
22-02-2009, 11:12 PM
f0xx is just being silly. He needs comforting

/me sends a friends request

Cyrus
22-02-2009, 11:15 PM
"and they cant retal us all. "

yes you can, you get a +2 but sure you can retal, so you send your allaiance at the top, they get online, retal steal ur land adn block ur attack.

..go for it

pROFL you obviously got what i meant right? O.o

i meant they cant attack all lets say 5 allis?

f0xx
22-02-2009, 11:26 PM
f0xx is just being silly. He needs comforting

And you need to learn how to calculate the amount of harvesters you need :D

JJbrosandjl
22-02-2009, 11:28 PM
And you need to learn how to calculate the amount of harvesters you need :D

I don't haz the maths skillz.

All I do is tab, a, tab, a, tab, a, tab, <input f0xx's ID>, click send :(

f0xx
22-02-2009, 11:34 PM
I don't haz the maths skillz.

All I do is tab, a, tab, a, tab, a, tab, <input f0xx's ID>, click send :(

X 60 members.

IceOfFire
22-02-2009, 11:45 PM
How's that resistance going f0xx?

[20:00] <x> You stole 800 land. [177] tree. [428] bush. [98] flower. [97] grass. [0] uncultivated.
[20:00] <x> You stole 783 land. [183] tree. [374] bush. [113] flower. [113] grass. [0] uncultivated.
[20:01] <x> You stole 784 land. [120] tree. [526] bush. [70] flower. [68] grass. [0] uncultivated.
[20:01] <x> You stole 588 land. [82] tree. [441] bush. [33] flower. [32] grass. [0] uncultivated.
[20:03] <x> [close] 60,807 hostile Geo-Phys Thief stole 969 land. [148] tree. [648] bush. [88] flower. [85] grass. [0] uncultivated.
[20:10] <x> You stole 825 land. [109] tree. [568] bush. [76] flower. [72] grass. [0] uncultivated.
[20:10] <x> [close] 482,424 allied Geo-Phys Thief stole 623 land. [107] tree. [441] bush. [38] flower. [37] grass. [0] uncultivated.
[20:19] <x>You stole 468 land. [91] tree. [196] bush. [87] flower. [94] grass. [0] uncultivated.
[22:40] <x> You stole 656 land. [112] tree. [455] bush. [47] flower. [42] grass. [0] uncultivated.
[22:40] <x> You stole 383 land. [85] tree. [205] bush. [47] flower. [46] grass. [0] uncultivated
[22:40] <x> You stole 518 land. [107] tree. [274] bush. [72] flower. [65] grass. [0] uncultivated.
[22:40] <x> You stole 315 land. [58] tree. [207] bush. [26] flower. [24] grass. [0] uncultivated.

[22:40] <DA|aweh> Hah. These guys didnt stand a chance.
[22:40] <DA|aweh> :o
[22:40] <x> lmao
[22:41] <DA|aweh> No pun intended

God you arrogance is starting to become amusing now DA. You really think you guys are the dogs nads!

3v1...whoop whoop you guys rock!

JJbrosandjl
22-02-2009, 11:45 PM
X 60 members.

59, Twigley is useless :P

Twigley
23-02-2009, 12:13 AM
Im not even playing :/
Changer told me not to :\

Steve_God
23-02-2009, 12:23 AM
59, Twigley is useless :P
Yeah... he's normally in the shower or something...
(Inside joke) :-P

FeR
23-02-2009, 12:33 AM
God you arrogance is starting to become amusing now DA. You really think you guys are the dogs nads!

3v1...whoop whoop you guys rock!

Maybe.. Could off been 3 vs 3 ^^

Dark_Angel
23-02-2009, 08:00 AM
whoop whoop you guys (tba) rock!

thanks :d

Cyrus
23-02-2009, 02:47 PM
your that good, when attacking WH and Chance, you were all getting slaughtered left right and centre, its jsut youtr numbers landed on us. stop being such a sore winner, coz its boring

pinpower
23-02-2009, 02:49 PM
lol cyrus, there was no "slaughtering"...

Cyrus
23-02-2009, 02:50 PM
lol cyrus, there was no "slaughtering"...

rofl which attacks were you on then? rofl.....

n0c0ntr0l
23-02-2009, 03:57 PM
hey we have enough land that if we didnt deliberately slaughter troops we would have no targets. so i dont mind slaughtering troops if it means i have more targets.

Cyrus
23-02-2009, 05:25 PM
hey we have enough land that if we didnt deliberately slaughter troops we would have no targets. so i dont mind slaughtering troops if it means i have more targets.

well ofc you'd say that, at the end of the day we slaughtered you wether you did mean us to or *not* but one of you is saying we didnt the other is saying we did, see what lies and contradiction we're all seeing? :)

Twigley
23-02-2009, 05:31 PM
Land for basic troops and then getting more teched and better trops while staying in range and getting more land then buying more better troops?

Yeah i cant see the logic in that, Cyrus.

Cyrus
23-02-2009, 07:14 PM
Land for basic troops and then getting more teched and better trops while staying in range and getting more land then buying more better troops?

Yeah i cant see the logic in that, Cyrus.

please quote where i said there was no logic.

Alcibiades
23-02-2009, 09:06 PM
your that good, when attacking WH and Chance, you were all getting slaughtered left right and centre, its jsut youtr numbers landed on us. stop being such a sore winner, coz its boring

Qft

WildDisease
23-02-2009, 11:12 PM
ROFL. HAHA.

/me is ripping the powerblock up left, right, and center.

this is fun :)

Twigley
23-02-2009, 11:23 PM
o_O
All i see is stealing land and small losses and doing damage.

IceOfFire
23-02-2009, 11:47 PM
o_O
All i see is stealing land and small losses and doing damage.

I'm not being bias, but thats bollocks

Dark_Angel
23-02-2009, 11:54 PM
For those of you who can't be arsed reading the entire thread, this is basically what's happening:

http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/5453/believepxd9.jpg

pinpower
23-02-2009, 11:55 PM
For those of you who can't be arsed reading the entire thread, this is basically what's happening:

http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/5453/believepxd9.jpg



Qft

Twigley
23-02-2009, 11:57 PM
http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/5453/believepxd9.jpg

Qft.

pinpower
23-02-2009, 11:58 PM
Just to fast forward...the end of the story is the little guys are left dead...while me and DA party with midgets and other exciting creatures!!!
x

septimus
24-02-2009, 02:28 AM
I suppose a benefit to being relegated to the lower ranks is a little more excitement then being near the top!

FeR
24-02-2009, 03:17 AM
http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/5453/believepxd9.jpg

Qtf.

Alcibiades
24-02-2009, 03:25 AM
http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/5453/believepxd9.jpg

Qtf.

lol

Quote the false? Quel'thalas, that fart? Quislings, the Fatherland? Quote the facts?

harriergirl
24-02-2009, 03:57 AM
http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/5453/believepxd9.jpg

Qtf.

lol

Quote the false? Quel'thalas, that fart? Quislings, the Fatherland? Quote the facts?

Quite the Farce ;)

Twigley
24-02-2009, 04:11 AM
QShut up.

DarkSider
24-02-2009, 08:27 AM
For those of you who can't be arsed reading the entire thread, this is basically what's happening:

http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/5453/believepxd9.jpg


Obviously you're on the powerblock side if you had to edit out " Believe " :D

Alcibiades
24-02-2009, 08:48 AM
QShut up.

feel free to take your own advice anytime you like Twigley.

LostinNY
26-02-2009, 10:07 PM
what is going on with inimical, they are down to 17 members and it looks like one of theirs is admin locked

alexx
26-02-2009, 10:14 PM
we are falling apart so u better start a resistance fast before we pull ourselves together!!

cb1202
08-03-2009, 02:32 AM
Just to fast forward...the end of the story is the little guys are left dead...while me and DA party with midgets and other exciting creatures!!!
x


From what I can see the little guys aren't dead. Infact it seems everytime you attack the little guys they take barely any losses, lose a little land (that they get back way before you can muster up enough people who arent afraid to die) and you guys get slaughtered.

Twigley
08-03-2009, 02:41 AM
From what i see the people at the top steal land at the cost of losses which puts them back in range :)

Cyrus
08-03-2009, 07:05 PM
yeah and your so land fat, next time you come back, it only takes one of us to cover 1 of you ;)

pinpower
08-03-2009, 07:07 PM
Thats okay, from what i hear not to many of your players (or IDs) are around anymore...;)
x

Cyrus
08-03-2009, 07:27 PM
you here completely wrong rofl :P

your facts are foolish! ;)

pinpower
08-03-2009, 07:31 PM
ha, ive always been foolish! tis why you love me!

Care to enlighten me as to where i am wrong?
x

Cyrus
08-03-2009, 07:50 PM
we are not inactive, infact far from it. LOL

IceOfFire
08-03-2009, 09:43 PM
We arn't?

:o

Alcibiades
08-03-2009, 09:43 PM
We arn't?

:o

No one told me :(

Martin
08-03-2009, 09:49 PM
We just prefer to play the game as it is, instead of partaking in your silly politics on forums. Even without us posting you seem to, very effectivly just make yourselves look very stupid.

You don't need us to be active to screw you over :)

Twigley
08-03-2009, 09:53 PM
We just prefer to play the game as it is, instead of partaking in your silly politics on forums.

Yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh......................

Garrett
09-03-2009, 02:06 PM
/me sits on the sidelines with some bread, cheeses and wine.


AAAhhhhhh to not have an ID. It makes this thread 15x more enjoyable AND pitiful.

LAFiN
09-03-2009, 11:19 PM
I would love to see what's going on in WHs alliance channel. By far the best defense planning I have ever seen. Great job guys. Shame on TBA for being noobs!

Polo
09-03-2009, 11:27 PM
I would love to see what's going on in WHs alliance channel. By far the best defense planning I have ever seen. Great job guys. Shame on TBA for being noobs!

It goes something like this:

noob: Oh no, we have inc.
noob2: Get Polo on!
Polo: I'm sleeping, stop ringing me!
noob: But we have inc.
Polo: Fine, defend me. I'm going back to bed.

Martin
09-03-2009, 11:28 PM
I would love to see what's going on in WHs alliance channel. By far the best defense planning I have ever seen. Great job guys. Shame on TBA for being noobs!

I don't know if the rest of my ally feels the same, but of all the allies I have been in, this one is the easiest to co-ordinate and is the most active. We are the Spartans to your Persians ;)

Twigley
09-03-2009, 11:30 PM
Isn't hard to organise againt pick and chose tactics.
Even polo could do that :o

;)

No-Dachi
09-03-2009, 11:45 PM
So you agree that your tactics suck?

Garrett
09-03-2009, 11:45 PM
I would love to see what's going on in WHs alliance channel. By far the best defense planning I have ever seen. Great job guys. Shame on TBA for being noobs!

It goes something like this:

noob: Oh no, we have inc.
noob2: Get Polo on!
Polo: I'm sleeping, stop ringing me!
noob: But we have inc.
Polo: Fine, defend me. I'm going back to bed.


All defend polo first tick is not a rule. It's a way of life. Especially if you've ever been his nightcover.

LAFiN
09-03-2009, 11:52 PM
Clearly the tactics we've been abusing other allies with all round long doesn't work with active, competent players. I'm just amazed, more or less, with how stupid some of the people in TBA have been when deciding to stay on clearly terrible attacks. Just frustrating switching from bashing crappy allies to the only one who puts up a fight.

Alcibiades
10-03-2009, 12:08 AM
Well I must say it certainly is nice to see at least someone capable of recognizing skill when they see it, and having the courage and grace to post that in public. Thanks Lafin, if only your compatriots were more like you ;)

IceOfFire
10-03-2009, 12:34 AM
Clearly the tactics we've been abusing other allies with all round long doesn't work with active, competent players. I'm just amazed, more or less, with how stupid some of the people in TBA have been when deciding to stay on clearly terrible attacks. Just frustrating switching from bashing crappy allies to the only one who puts up a fight.



Errrr Chance fight you guys everytime...Take earlier for example, you tried hitting us. Not one of you guys landed and 2 of you got pwned, we lost nothing.

Don't just give WH credit :P

f0xx
10-03-2009, 12:42 AM
Clearly the tactics we've been abusing other allies with all round long doesn't work with active, competent players. I'm just amazed, more or less, with how stupid some of the people in TBA have been when deciding to stay on clearly terrible attacks. Just frustrating switching from bashing crappy allies to the only one who puts up a fight.



Errrr Chance fight you guys everytime...Take earlier for example, you tried hitting us. Not one of you guys landed and 2 of you got pwned, we lost nothing.

Don't just give WH credit :P
We don't share our ladies IoF, get your own :D

IceOfFire
10-03-2009, 12:48 AM
hahaha

alexx
10-03-2009, 03:13 AM
Well I must say it certainly is nice to see at least someone capable of recognizing skill when they see it, and having the courage and grace to post that in public. Thanks Lafin, if only your compatriots were more like you ;)

okok, i havent suicided on any attacks. But i must say it doesnt really take skill to send striker def vs a robo or vamp vs a SA. It's common sense and some ppl in TBA seems to be braindead/doesnt care/wants lower score.

After a certain time u kinda learn all the units by hearth etc. Not much skill involved in this game.

Bushtarion is all activity/route setup/gmt zones/contactability/NOT staying on obv defense. If u call that skill then kk.

Alcibiades
10-03-2009, 03:59 AM
Well I must say it certainly is nice to see at least someone capable of recognizing skill when they see it, and having the courage and grace to post that in public. Thanks Lafin, if only your compatriots were more like you ;)

okok, i havent suicided on any attacks. But i must say it doesnt really take skill to send striker def vs a robo or vamp vs a SA. It's common sense and some ppl in TBA seems to be braindead/doesnt care/wants lower score.

After a certain time u kinda learn all the units by heart etc. Not much skill involved in this game.

Bushtarion is all activity/route setup/gmt zones/contactability/NOT staying on obv defense. If u call that skill then kk.


Rofl. If you tell me that some of the defence organized in War Huh isn't spectacular, than you're just plain ignorant, sir. I know it doesn't take rocket science to set up defence, but you can tell the difference between well done defence, and an adequate job. I'm also sure you must be aware that when you have more than just a handful of incoming it becomes a little more tricky than simply sending 'striker to robo and vamp to SA'. And defending against waves is a skill in and of itself. If you deny any of these things than I'm afraid you're just wrong. I'd say the game is about 85% activity/contactibility and the remaining 15% is skill. Most of that skill I believe involves being able to call and organize defence.

I'm well aware that many of the TBA members wish to lose score, but I'm pretty sure not all of them wished to lose as much as they did in the manner they did. Also the fact that you tend not to steal an overwhelming amount compared to what you guys send in your waves and how much damage you take in comparison to what you deal really does make me wonder Since I haven't noticed you shining out in any particular way in your attacks on the alliance of which i'm a member, your libel is nothing short of hilarious :P

No-Dachi
10-03-2009, 08:09 AM
[

Bushtarion is all activity/route setup/gmt zones/contactability/NOT staying on obv defense. If u call that skill then kk.


Alex, it's a difference "planning" the defence of two incomings when you have 10 members online, to plan the defence of 10 incoming mobs spread out on 3 ticks on 7 different members, when you only have those 10 online members to take from. Especially when all the incoming is between 150% and 300% of your members score, as your inc is to us.

There are different levels of knowledge in every area of life, and saying that because you find building a tree hut easy there is no skill involved in building a three story house is just ignorant.


And that "NOT staying on obv defense" made me chuckle. 4 out of 5 times you guys(assuming you are in TBA) either stay and get pwned beyond recognition, or recall to obv fakes..

BlackWolf
10-03-2009, 08:16 AM
Skill? War? Huh? wtf?

f0xx
10-03-2009, 08:28 AM
Not much skill involved in this game.
Wrong.


Not much skill involved in TBA.
Right.


[edit] Also it is funny to see how someone who swaps members just to be able to cover incomings says it is "so easy to defend". You sure back-up your words with action boys.

Dark_Angel
10-03-2009, 11:58 AM
Not much skill involved in this game.
Wrong.


Not much skill involved in TBA.
Right.


[edit] Also it is funny to see how someone who swaps members just to be able to cover incomings says it is "so easy to defend". You sure back-up your words with action boys.

Lol, make sure you don't pull words out of thin air. He didn't say it was easy to defend. :P

As for member swapping, S_G swapped in a few guys from Inim when 5-6 alliances massed them and we had no real chance of stopping more than 2-3 attacks.

5. Thats the biggest number of alliances to hit an alliance this round, TBA coming second sending mass attacks comprising of guys from each of its 3 wings.

You couldn't cope with 3 how were we supposed to cope with 5? A reminder that us having twice as much land as you at the time doesn't really matter a great deal :P

No-Dachi
10-03-2009, 12:20 PM
How can you even begin to compare the top three alliances with a combined value of 515 billion to five alliances with the combined value of 190 billion?

Your logic is flawed, mister.

Steve_God
10-03-2009, 12:44 PM
How can you even begin to compare the top three alliances with a combined value of 515 billion to five alliances with the combined value of 190 billion?

Your logic is flawed, mister.
The logic is from nearly 2 weeks ago now when S_G actually got rapidly raped down from Rank 3 to Rank 6 in the space of a few hours, and would've continued dropping rapidly if it wasn't for a few player swaps.

Dark_Angel
10-03-2009, 12:49 PM
How can you even begin to compare the top three alliances with a combined value of 515 billion to five alliances with the combined value of 190 billion?

Your logic is flawed, mister.

S_G had next to no troops, and nearly all land (mainly from the flak wars).

We would have died very easily had it not been for help, we were overwhelmed by a massive amount of incoming from 5-6 alliances.

Land score.

BlackWolf
10-03-2009, 01:02 PM
Yeah your land score at a time when everyones score was mainly land score was so big that you actually had no troops and your acres produced so slowly funds that all those people who had 2-4 times less land got more units.

Dark_Angel
10-03-2009, 01:04 PM
Yeah your land score at a time when everyones score was mainly land score was so big that you actually had no troops and your acres produced so slowly funds that all those people who had 2-4 times less land got more units.

The problem was that the majority of our land was with the minority... and those minority of players werent able to cover the entire alliance. Myself one of those players.

BlackWolf
10-03-2009, 01:06 PM
Yeah your alliances had few people with 10 times the acres of others and then you had 15 members in each alliance who had next to no acres... actually they had less than average resistance member so those 15 with huge acres were defending everyone else...

Umm... or not.

Polo
10-03-2009, 01:09 PM
I don't understand why SG are trying to make themselves appear to be as ***** as they are saying they relied on JJ and Twigs to win rather than bigging themselves up. :S

Garrett
10-03-2009, 01:15 PM
I don't understand why SG are trying to make themselves appear to be as ***** as they are saying they relied on JJ and Twigs to win rather than bigging themselves up. :S

indeed it seems a reversal from all their arrogant posts just a few pages earlier in this very thread.

and they wonder why they get called noobs.

Steve_God
10-03-2009, 02:25 PM
I don't understand why SG are trying to make themselves appear to be as ***** as they are saying they relied on JJ and Twigs to win rather than bigging themselves up. :S

indeed it seems a reversal from all their arrogant posts just a few pages earlier in this very thread.
Well observed Garrett :)

This is a politics thread... of course we were going to be arrogant about it and act like we were unaffected... if we'd made posts like my last one before we'd recovered, we'd have given the resistance the drive to keep the pressure on us, and S_G would have been down and out :)

Garrett
10-03-2009, 02:41 PM
Oh I'm well versed in politics Steve. It's just amusing how shock and offended some of your people seem now that they get called out on it.

If they are willing to talk the smack, they need to be prepared to be smacked.

"oh we just acted this way cuz of this, now don't get on to us or beat us cuz we're pitiful" - it just doesn't cut it.

LAFiN
10-03-2009, 04:56 PM
Sorry IOF, I wasn't involved in those attacks, but I do know we've had a fair amount of success hitting Chance. For about the past week or so there has been hardly any attacks that have gone well on WH.

Dark_Angel
10-03-2009, 05:51 PM
I don't understand why SG are trying to make themselves appear to be as ***** as they are saying they relied on JJ and Twigs to win rather than bigging themselves up. :S

Because not all members of S_G are *****. Admittedly a fair few were, no surprise given we were and still are the weakest of the 3 TBA wings.

I'm simply defending those who aren't ***** :D

Labelling the entire alliance **** is tbh, narrowminded.

Garrett
10-03-2009, 06:19 PM
Because not all members of S_G are *****. Admittedly a fair few were, no surprise given we were and still are the weakest of the 3 TBA wings.

Labelling the entire alliance **** is tbh, narrowminded.

considering you were willing to take the label tba (in the 2nd page of this thread), and posted the pick of tba vs war huh and chance from DS's siggy and were on about how much land *you* stole (yes wasn't just you, but you didn't present it that way did you?) on the FIRST page...

yeah they can label your group tba and/or alliance however they want. you coming in here and bragging and then now after falling asking for clemency is wanting special treatment for your bruised ego's. roll with the punches.

since you admit that S_G was and is the weakest of the wings, you addressed your own alliance as a group and as the weakest. S_G players are the ***** players from tba is what you are saying whether you intended to or not. So everyone is fully justified in calling S_G ***** by your very own admission.

incoming lame argument telling me what i see in black and white text is wrong, but it's cool. go ahead and post for the last word as that's what you care about.

LAFiN
10-03-2009, 06:35 PM
Garrett, by your own argument, every alliance below S_G is also *****.

Dark_Angel
10-03-2009, 06:47 PM
since you admit that S_G was and is the weakest of the wings, you addressed your own alliance as a group and as the weakest. S_G players are the ***** players from tba is what you are saying whether you intended to or not. So everyone is fully justified in calling S_G ***** by your very own admission.


Thats some very imaginative perception work Garrett o.o

Lemme get this straight - Because I call S_G the weakest, generally, of the three wings, I'm as a result saying *all* S_G members are crap?

Talk about putting words in my mouth o.0

Again, just for you Garrett :) - We *had* a number of poor players, we've now dropped these guys. We are still the weakest alliance, but that is a statement complementing the calibre of the members above us - not me saying "our alliance sucks and you're all right to say we do" :P - No :)

Not all that difficult to grasp really :?:

cb1202
10-03-2009, 07:22 PM
So from the past two pages all I have gathered is that SG would have lost had it not been for the very tactic that everyone is calling them noobs for being a part of. Doesn't that prove the point that everyone has been trying to make about the powerblock?

Garrett
10-03-2009, 07:30 PM
Garrett, by your own argument, every alliance below S_G is also *****.

to clarify,

1) every alliance below rank 1 is *****. so yes.

2) by DA's admission that his group is weak means that he shouldn't get on to others for calling them ***** (calling the group ***** is a broad generalization. the generalization is going both ways) By SG's performance, yes they are *****. Did I say every *individual* was *****? no - their classifcation as an ally is that they suck. That's been admitted by DA in his post and in the rankings and dealings of the round. Any argument to the contrary at this point is a circular argument that will result in the next poster simply hitting their head against the wall. People will try and I encourage them to do so as it's very amusing.

it's quite simple. SG talked the talk and now they are paying for it and the most vocal members talking about how buff they 'were' are now saying uh uh it's not really our fault. Simple as.

Cyrus
10-03-2009, 07:50 PM
How can you even begin to compare the top three alliances with a combined value of 515 billion to five alliances with the combined value of 190 billion?

Your logic is flawed, mister.
The logic is from nearly 2 weeks ago now when S_G actually got rapidly raped down from Rank 3 to Rank 6 in the space of a few hours, and would've continued dropping rapidly if it wasn't for a few player swaps.

the player swap was the not reason for your survival, more like, the res attacks stopped.
your alliance was as much use at putting up a fight, as its as useful to have a chocolate teapot

pinpower
10-03-2009, 07:52 PM
lol cyrus, talk about trying to fit an analogy in there...good try though.

Dark_Angel
10-03-2009, 07:53 PM
Garrett, by your own argument, every alliance below S_G is also *****.

to clarify,

1) every alliance below rank 1 is *****. so yes.

2) by DA's admission that his group is weak means that he shouldn't get on to others for calling them ***** (calling the group ***** is a broad generalization. the generalization is going both ways) By SG's performance, yes they are *****. Did I say every *individual* was *****? no - their classifcation as an ally is that they suck. That's been admitted by DA in his post and in the rankings and dealings of the round. Any argument to the contrary at this point is a circular argument that will result in the next poster simply hitting their head against the wall. People will try and I encourage them to do so as it's very amusing.

it's quite simple. SG talked the talk and now they are paying for it and the most vocal members talking about how buff they 'were' are now saying uh uh it's not really our fault. Simple as.



1) I didn't say my group is "weak" - I said it was the weakest of the 3 wings.
2) Calling an alliance ***** is a generalization and implies that all members of the alliance suck. My entire argument here is that not all members of S_G were crap, nor are all members of S_G crap. Your imaginative but fairly uninteresting manipulation of what people have said/are saying is not strengthening your argument. It is instead making you look like someone who needs to twist the words of others to have an argument that can stand up properly.
3) Your view that every alliance that isn't winning sucks is intriguing but unsurprising given your persona.

And on that note I think I'll leave this conversation here, for two reasons. One is that as far as I know you're not even playing this round, properly, and therefore one has to question the the basis of any argument you put forth.

And two - you're incapable of having a perspective other than your own. (As far as I'm concerned :) )

Garrett
10-03-2009, 08:00 PM
And two - you're incapable of having a perspective other than your own. (As far as I'm concerned :) )

Hi Pot, Kettle called and left a message.

Yep i'm not playing this round at all. I simply have reviewed every page of this thread. Your posts are silly.

keep them coming!

Changer
10-03-2009, 08:12 PM
And two - you're incapable of having a perspective other than your own. (As far as I'm concerned :) )

Hi Pot, Kettle called and left a message.

Yep i'm not playing this round at all. I simply have reviewed every page of this thread. Your posts are silly.

keep them coming!

I fail to see the point to 99% of your posts on this forum.

Martin
10-03-2009, 08:18 PM
And two - you're incapable of having a perspective other than your own. (As far as I'm concerned :) )

Hi Pot, Kettle called and left a message.

Yep i'm not playing this round at all. I simply have reviewed every page of this thread. Your posts are silly.

keep them coming!

I fail to see the point to 99% of your posts on this forum.


There is no more point to Garrett's posts than smoking cigarettes and masterbation. They have no real use, but are highly enjoyable and adictive.

Much love Garrett.

Garrett
10-03-2009, 08:59 PM
I've always loved you most Martini.



I fail to see the point to 99% of your posts on this forum.

I'm used to 99% of this forum not reading for comprehension. So this is not shocking news to me. Thanks for your patronage tho!

Steve_God
10-03-2009, 09:53 PM
There is no more point to Garrett's posts than smoking cigarettes and masterbation. They have no real use, but are highly enjoyable and adictive.
So very true :P

Jonny
28-03-2009, 08:49 PM
Don't want to be off topic and maybe I missed something in the forums but I'm curious if anything new happened or what exactly is happening at all right now between about the top 6 alliances.
Noticed S_G went public and that they have more acres than overlude, is TBA breaking apart or is this just because of member switching or what exactly is going on?

Dark_Angel
28-03-2009, 09:19 PM
Don't want to be off topic and maybe I missed something in the forums but I'm curious if anything new happened or what exactly is happening at all right now between about the top 6 alliances.
Noticed S_G went public and that they have more acres than overlude, is TBA breaking apart or is this just because of member switching or what exactly is going on?

TBA are still winged. S_G have simply chosen to go public, as they've balls :P (Though WH? chose to do that a fair while ago, and have admirably held rank regardless :) )

lavadog
28-03-2009, 09:50 PM
^didn't you guys already have WH's id's before they went public? Since you guys are probably the only ones attacking them, holding rank didn't really depend on them being private imo :P

Twigley
29-03-2009, 12:53 PM
Noticed S_G went public and that they have more acres than overlude

SG stole some more acres and we had a person restart :P
Still nearly 100b score difference.

But yeah, why so surprised SG are doing well? ;)

Matthew
31-03-2009, 02:25 AM
I've always loved you most Martini.



I fail to see the point to 99% of your posts on this forum.

I'm used to 99% of this forum not reading for comprehension. So this is not shocking news to me. Thanks for your patronage tho!

That is quite possibly one of the most amazing posts on this forums. However I think having a "No team, No opinion" notion heavily applies to you, as you have admitted you are not contributing to the round practically so why express your 2 cents regarding politics.

No-Dachi
31-03-2009, 12:10 PM
So because I am not actively involved in politics and campaigning I should not be allowed to have an opinion about how my country runs..? I sincerly hope I misunderstood your post.

timtadams
31-03-2009, 12:50 PM
So because I am not actively involved in politics and campaigning I should not be allowed to have an opinion about how my country runs..? I sincerly hope I misunderstood your post.

I was thinking the same thing, i dont think we misunderstood him :(

then again, maybe he didnt express himself the way he wished to...

Matthew
31-03-2009, 02:12 PM
So because I am not actively involved in politics and campaigning I should not be allowed to have an opinion about how my country runs..? I sincerly hope I misunderstood your post.

That is a completely different scenario. Politics is something that will directly affect you, whereas because Garrett is not involved in the round, anything that occurs politically regarding the round will have no affect on him. So if something doesn't concern him and he is in no position to influence the activities of the round why should he voice his opinion largely in the form of flames and trolls? There is nothing for anyone to gain from him, he is just an empty vessel with regards to this situation blazing around and making a lot of noise for the sake of doing so.

The thing is I would be more accepting of his contributions if he didn't deliberately voice them in order to provoke a negative reaction.

f0xx
31-03-2009, 02:25 PM
Forums are for discussions. Don't tell people not to give their opinions.

Garrett
31-03-2009, 02:49 PM
and you have no idea if i'm really playing or not. politics is about propaganda.

thanks for looking foolish.

the facts? I started for a few days, was very unhappy and stopped playing. So I actually DO know what happened at round start and many things that influneced this whole thread to begin with.

I stopped playing for many weeks and did not have an ID at the time I was interviewed for the propaganda pieces. However, after talking to darksider and seeing many unbecoming posts, I made a new ID to rush the top... I am massing my wealth and units as we speak. i've already started rushing to wake people up and check for defense.

now matthew, I hope you are satisfied and I've conveniently drawn this circle for your nose over there in the corner.

Matthew
31-03-2009, 03:44 PM
Forums are for discussions. Don't tell people not to give their opinions.

Agreed, for discussion, not spam/flames deliberately made to provoke others. Many people can manage it so why can't others?

Matthew
31-03-2009, 03:49 PM
and you have no idea if i'm really playing or not. politics is about propaganda.

thanks for looking foolish.

the facts? I started for a few days, was very unhappy and stopped playing. So I actually DO know what happened at round start and many things that influneced this whole thread to begin with.

I stopped playing for many weeks and did not have an ID at the time I was interviewed for the propaganda pieces. However, after talking to darksider and seeing many unbecoming posts, I made a new ID to rush the top... I am massing my wealth and units as we speak. i've already started rushing to wake people up and check for defense.

now matthew, I hope you are satisfied and I've conveniently drawn this circle for your nose over there in the corner.

Nothing you have done is political or even slightly alludes towards propaganda, so you can also begin to ignore the fact you consider yourself to be some form of political genius.

In no way did I personally make myself look foolish, so you can take that sweeping statement back and wait to use it constructively.

What I have placed in bold is a prime example of why 99% of your posts are dismissed and considered to be pointless. Your callous behaviour just makes people dismiss everything you say, so when eventually you want to be constructive and actually influence something of importance everyone except from your old fan club will ignore you.

We might as well make some use of that circle you've drawn so feel free to utilise it whenever.

Garrett
31-03-2009, 04:24 PM
I'm sorry were you saying something? I couldn't hear you over the sound of you taking this game as serious business.

You are making claims of my self proclaimed political genius. Hmm I would *love* for you to quote me saying anything close to that.

You and others automatic assumptions of me are your failures not mine. You put words in my mouth and additional actions to my name that I've never done or uttered.

As long as you continue to do that, I'm never going to care what you have to say.

Carry on citizen.

CLem
31-03-2009, 04:26 PM
Politics is something that will directly affect you, whereas because Garrett is not involved in the round, anything that occurs politically regarding the round will have no affect on him. So if something doesn't concern him and he is in no position to influence the activities of the round why should he voice his opinion largely in the form of flames and trolls?

That and the fact that he has got an ID and playing does make you look a bit foolish. And even so as people already mentioned, if something doesn't directly influence you, you can still voice an opinion regarding the matter.

In this case Garrett is indirectly influenced by the underhand tactic used by some people.(He can't pee properly when he sees people using noobie tactic, fact!!)

Garrett
31-03-2009, 04:28 PM
In this case Garrett is indirectly influenced by the underhand tactic used by some people.(He can't pee properly when he sees people using noobie tactic, fact!!)

DAMMIT! I told you in private :(


Clem adopt me so I can has your health planz.

harriergirl
04-04-2009, 12:52 AM
... nm

WildDisease
05-04-2009, 12:56 AM
I'm sorry were you saying something? I couldn't hear you over the sound of you taking this game as serious business.


LOL!